Blueprints for a Starship

posted by admin on June 6, 2011

‘Robot probes – flashing through nearby star systems and radioing back their observations during a few hectic hours of transit … Barring accidents, they would continue speeding through the galaxy forever …’

Clarke, The Songs of Distant Earth, 1986

As Project Icarus enters its next stage we will, slowly but surely, move towards a precise quantitative design for our hypothetical interstellar probe.

But some interstellar craft in science fiction have featured remarkably detailed and plausible designs – not surprisingly, as many of them derived from work by, or were even written by, experts in the field. What can we learn from these fictional precedents?

In what follows I’m going to focus on ships of the Icarus/Daedalus class, very loosely speaking – that is, no much-slower-than-light multi-generation worldships, as featured from Heinlein’s Universe [1] to Greg Bear’s recent, and excellent, Hull Zero Three [2], and no faster-than-light behemoths like Star Trek’s Enterprise, probably the most detailed fictional starship of all, or the Alcubierre-drive starship of my own Ark [3] (2009). As this is a fairly informal blog I haven’t overloaded the article with specific technical references, but I’ve included pointers to sources where appropriate, mostly via Matloff’s recent survey [4].


Paul Gilster’s excellent Centauri Dreams [5] is, among other things, a good source of information on starships in sf. The earliest interstellar journey Paul identifies (p31) is by a French writer called C.L. Defontenay, dating from 1854; the ship was driven by a kind of antigravity. In sf’s pulp era of the early twentieth century, various fanciful space drives featured in the fiction of writers like EE Doc Smith, whose pioneering space opera Skylark of Space (1928) [6] appears to have featured a kind of inertial drive.

What was the first credible starship design in fiction? The earliest identified by Gilster ([5] p102) is a kind of solar sail, in a book called The Extraordinary Adventures of a Russian Scientist by the French writers Georges le Faure and Henri de Graffigny, published in 1889-91. It was after the quest for scientific rigour in sf pioneered by the great Astounding Science Fiction editor John W. Campbell from the late 1930s that starships of a more or less realistic design began to appear regularly in the genre.


Maybe it’s no surprise that the first realistic fictional starship was a lightsail. As far as I’m aware this is the only candidate interstellar propulsion technology whose underlying principles were thoroughly defined and indeed demonstrated by the end of the nineteenth century ([5] p103). Paul Gilster highlights an early and memorable depiction of a solar sail ship in Cordwainer Smith’s 1960 story ‘The Lady Who Sailed the Soul’ [7]. But it was probably Clarke’s 1964 story ‘The Wind from the Sun’ [8] that cemented the idea in the public consciousness.

Rigorous developments of the technology as a means of interstellar travel began with the work of Robert L. Forward. An early use of Forward’s ideas was by Niven and Pournelle in their 1974 novel The Mote in God’s Eye [9]. Aliens from a star known as the Mote launch a 450,000-ton craft across 35ly (light years) at 7% of c (lightspeed) to the human-occupied ‘New Caledonia’ system. The ‘Moties’ use a laser-pushed lightsail; the sail is thousands of kilometres across and the laser blasts for 45 years. On its approach the ship itself is visible; it decelerates using the light of New Cal’s sun, which is reflected back blue-shifted (details [9] chapters 4 and 6). Forward however felt the authors glossed over the difficulties of deceleration: ‘I had warned them that the light from the Sun was not strong enough to stop the sail, but, being science fiction writers … they ignored my advice and pretended it would work’ ([5] p127).

Forward first presented his own deceleration design in the pages of a novel, Rocheworld [10], before writing it up for technical publication. In the 2020s, the twenty-strong crew of the Prometheus, the first manned starship, are to be propelled to Barnard’s Star by ‘a solar-system-wide machine that would toss them to the stars on a beam of light’ (p42). Forward goes into great technical detail, including graphs and diagrams.

The ship will make a forty-year, one-way journey across six light years to the target star. The payload massing ~3500t is to be dragged by a sail 1000km wide; total launch mass is ~82,000t. The core of the propulsion system is a set of a thousand laser stations, each 30km wide, in sun-synchronous orbit around Mercury. These together convert solar energy into laser beams with a combined total power of 1300TW. The beams are united by a ‘beam combiner’ at Mercury’s L-2 point, and ultimately passed through a 300-km transmitter lens between Saturn and Uranus (!).Forward’s ingenious deceleration method is to split the craft’s sail in two; a torus, detached from a central section, goes ahead of the craft, collects a fresh 2-year burst of laser light from the solar system, and reflects it back on the residual 300km-diameter sail still attached to the ship, thus slowing it down.

Forward always thought big – and Rocheworld shows Forward’s imagination at its staggering best. However the design brings vulnerabilities, as Forward dramatises. The propulsion system needs continuous support on the ground for decades; in the end political opposition nearly kills the project.

Encounter with Tiber, a 1996 novel by Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin with sf veteran John Barnes [11], is about visits to Earth by ‘Tiberans’, natives of Alpha Centauri, fleeing disastrous impact events in that system. Two generations of starfaring technology are used by the Tiberans: solar sails, and later ‘zero-point energy lasers’ (of which more later). Gregory Matloff, who contributed to the theoretical development of interstellar solar sailing ([4] p52), was a consultant on the book, and the result shows in the detail depicted.

The starship Wahkopem Zomos is a stubby cylinder ~20m high with a habitat ring, rotated for artificial gravity. (The distances are my estimates from the text; the ship is described in alien units!) At launch it is connected to a booster stack ~100m tall; an antimatter reaction creates a plasma rocket to drive the ship into its sun, Alpha Centauri A, where its solar sail ~1000km wide is unfurled for a perihelion manoeuvre. After a second perihelion push at Alpha B, the ship is driven further by lasers. Ultimately the ship reaches ~0.4c. Deceleration is achieved by a ‘brakeloop’ of superconducting filament ~100km across; this ionises the interstellar medium, thus converting the ship’s kinetic energy to heat. The ship was to be brought back from Sol using a laser beam fired from Alpha Centauri and reflected from a separately launched 5000km mirror sail. In the event political opposition causes this system to be abandoned, stranding the crew until a more advanced ship comes to fetch them.


Lightsails are beautiful and the ride comes for free – but rockets are more fun! In my own novel Space [12] my hero Reid Malenfant uses a Daedalus-type pulsed-fusion rocket to make a one-way dash to an interstellar teleport node.

The ultimate rocket fuel is of course antimatter. An antimatter rocket launches the AXIS probe (Automated eXplorer of Interstellar Space) to Alpha Centauri in Greg Bear’s Queen of Angels [13]. The journey takes fifteen years; for the first four years the probe is accelerated by the products of an antimatter-matter reaction, and then nanotechnology is used to manufacture huge ‘superconducting wings’ which decelerate the probe through drag from the Galaxy’s magnetic field. In an afterword Bear refers to Forward’s work on antimatter drives, and work by Matloff and Fennelly on the deceleration technique ([4] p95). Bear gives only one precise figure about his ingenious ship, and that’s the cost: one hundred billion dollars.

Another antimatter rocket features in one of the more detailed starship designs in recent sf: the Venture Star of James Cameron’s 2009 movie Avatar. Cameron and his consultants did a good deal of research and design work on the ship, as on many aspects of the movie, not all of which shows up on screen; however background material has been published in various tie-in media [14].

The Venture Star is one of a fleet of interstellar ferries, each designed to carry 200 passengers to Pandora, most of them in ‘cryosleep’ – and including ‘avatars’, the human-native hybrid bodies used to explore the moon. On its return it carries 350t of cargo, much of it the precious superconducting mineral ‘unobtainium’, which is essential for antimatter containment. The ship is over a kilometre long, much of which is strut to separate the habitable compartments from the ‘hybrid deuterium fusion / matter-antimatter engine’.

The ship is launched from the solar system with a laser push on a ‘photon sail’ 16km in diameter. During the launch a ‘mirror shield’ protects the crew compartments from the laser; during the cruise phase at 0.7c this is deployed as a shield against the interstellar medium. Deceleration is achieved using the antimatter engine. This flight sequence is reversed for the return trip.

Bussard Ramjets

The trouble with rockets is that you need to carry fuel. When it was first proposed in 1960 the beauty of the Bussard ramjet ([4] p109ff) was that it appeared to offer ultra-fast interstellar travel without the need to carry any fuel at all.

Ramjets featured in the sf of Larry Niven almost from Bussard’s first publication. The mighty Ringworld used ramjets as attitude stabilisers [15]. Excitement reached fever pitch when Carl Sagan, for example, examined an arbitrarily long ramjet journey at an acceleration of 1g; he found that thanks to time dilation the ship could reach the boundary of the visible universe within the lifetime of a crew member [16].

Unfortunately, further studies into the ramjet design indicated that such marvellous dreams are probably impractical. Modified ramjet designs appeared, but these lacked the power, and indeed the romance, of the original notion. In Footfall, written by Niven with Pournelle [17], the fithp, invaders from Alpha Centauri, travel in what appears to be a modified ramjet of the ‘ram augmented interstellar rocket’ (RAIR) kind. The Message Bearer (chapter 16) is a mile-long cylinder, surrounded by a metallic band that appears to be the core of the ramjet system. The ship was launched with a vast spherical fuel tank attached to the nose, evidently fuel for fusion reactors which use the interstellar medium as reaction matter. The ship is turned halfway to Sol to use the ramscoop for deceleration. The mother ship incidentally carries warships which appear to use Daedalus-type pulsed-fusion drives; these are also used to manoeuvre the mother ship.

It takes several fithp generations for Message Bearer to cross from the nearest star. So much for ramjets! But the disillusion with the idea did not come early enough to quash the inspiration for what many readers regard as the quintessential starflight novel.

Poul Anderson’s Tau Zero [18] – the novel after which of course the Tau Zero Foundation, partners in Icarus, was named – was surely inspired by Sagan’s visionary calculations. The starship Leonora Christine with its 50 crew sets off on an exploratory mission to Beta Virginis 32ly away. The ship, like ‘a dagger pointed at the stars’ (Chapter 2), comes with a gym and swimming pool! Under an ion drive it spirals out from Earth orbit at 0.1g. When it has achieved sufficient velocity the Bussard unit opens up at the rear of the craft: ‘the scoopfield webs … glistened in the sunlight, silver across starry black’ (Chapter 3). These webs are the root of a ‘field of magnetohydrodynamic forces’ thousands of kilometres across. The fields also serve as shields from the interstellar medium. Crucially, there are separate acceleration vs. deceleration ramjet systems.

A few light years out, calamity strikes. The ship hits a fast-moving nebula – and, already moving at a high percentage of lightspeed (‘low tau’), the crew find their deceleration system is wrecked. To go outside the ship to make repairs they would need to turn the acceleration system off – but that would take down the shields too, killing the crew. The ship must go on ever faster, time dilation becoming ever stronger, until the distances and times travelled become cosmological: ‘We will not be able to stop before the death of the universe … I propose we go on to the next cycle of the cosmos’ (chapter 20). Much of the book is dated now – the Bussard physics, the cosmology. But the sheer sense of wonder never dates; and many researchers into interstellar flight cite Tau Zero as a specific inspiration for their careers.

Vacuum Energy

What about more exotic drives?

The exploitation of vacuum energy as a star drive seems to have been pioneered by Charles Sheffield in his story ‘All the Colours of the Vacuum’ (1981) [19]. This is fun hard sf written by a physicist, but the drive’s details are a bit vague: ‘The available [vacuum] energies made up a quasi-continuous “spectrum” … Tuned resonators in the .. drive units selected certain wavelengths which were excited by the corresponding components in the vacuum self-energy. These “colours,” as McAndrew thought of them, could feed vacuum energy to the drive system …’

The vacuum energy (aka ‘zero point energy’) drive in Encounter with Tiber by Aldrin and Barnes [11], based on work by Matloff who consulted on the novel ([4] p132), works by manipulating the Casimir effect – the one way we do know to extract the energy. Little specific detail is given, but you get a sense of the fragility of a drive generated by manipulating plates held a few atomic diameters apart.

Vacuum energy was most famously exploited by Clarke in his 1986 novel The Songs of Distant Earth [20]. Fleeing the impending nova explosion of the sun, the Magellan leaves for a star more than a hundred light years away. Essentially a cylinder four kilometres long, and carrying a small conscious crew supervising a million frozen sleepers, Magellan is driven at 0.2c by a ‘quantum ramjet’. In his acknowledgements Clarke cites papers by Froning in JBIS and elsewhere ([4] p131) for speculation on the use of vacuum energies for propulsion, but he is even vaguer than Sheffield in the details of how the drive works. In the engine room we glimpse only ‘the shrouded metal and crystal shapes, the curiously-formed flying buttresses springing from the walls of the chamber, the pulsing constellations of lights, the sphere of utter blackness that, even though it was completely featureless, somehow seemed to be spinning … “One day it will make us masters of the Galaxy”’ (chapter 53).

However, with assistance from Alan Bond of the BIS, Clarke went into interesting detail on one often-neglected aspect of star missions: the ablation shielding required to protect such a craft from the interstellar medium. To travel ~50ly at 0.2c the Magellan requires ~100,000t of water ice moulded into a conical shield. In this book the shielding actually drives the story; to replenish the ice the Magellan is forced to call at an Earthlike planet called Thalassa 50ly from Earth, previously colonised by a ‘seedship’; the plot develops from the interaction of the Thalassans with the starship crew.

An Armada of Dreams

For fun I have attached a table summarising the characteristics of some of these paper starships, with Daedalus as a comparison [21].

One impression that stands out from these careful dramatisations is how appallingly difficult interstellar travel is. Schemes based on current or near-future technologies are huge, elaborate, rickety, fragile – the thousands of laser stations, the sails and lenses the size of moons. We even have to combine technologies; we put lightsails on antimatter rockets. There is surely only so far you can take this. Once the ancient Greeks put sails on rowing boats, but the result was not a nuclear submarine. On the other hand, Columbus’s ships were inadequate to meet the challenges of an Atlantic crossing – but he went anyway.

And in the pages of a novel you glimpse the sheer mine-bending scale of the engineering needed. Forward’s mighty laser beam was visible from Barnard’s Star [10], and Clarke’s quantum-ramjet Magellan is still visible as a 3rd magnitude star some 15 light years out ([20] chapter 55). How wonderful to imagine human engineering visible across interstellar distances.


Parameter Daedalus [21] ‘Crazy Eddie Probe’ [9] Prometheus [10] Wahkopem Zomos [11] Venture Star [14] Message Bearer [17] Leonora Christine [18] Magellan [20]
Source Human Motie Human Tiberan Human Fithp Human Human
Date Late C21 3017 2020s 7000BC 2154 1980s ~2500? 3800
Destination Barnard’s Star ‘New Caledonia System’ (35ly from Mote) Barnard’s Star Sol (from Alpha Cen) Alpha Cen Sol (from Alpha Cen) Beta Vir (32ly) ‘Sagan 2’ (100ly)
Duration 48y 40y ~6y (subj) Generations ~5y (subj) 500y
Cruise speed 0.12c 0.07c 0.15c 0.4c 0.7c ~c 0.2c
Dimensions 54,000t 450,000t; sail ~1000s km Payload 3500t, total at launch 82000t 20m-long payload Length 1.6km, payload 350t 1 mile long 4km long
Crew 1 Motie plus miniatures 20 ~200 (most sleepers) 50 1 million (sleepers)
Primary propulsion Fusion pellets Lightsail, laser and solar Lightsail, 1300TW laser 1000km solar sail, EM braking 16km lightsail, antimatter drive RAIR Bussard ramjet Quantum ramjet
Secondary propulsion Plasma rocket Pulsed fusion Ion drive
Shielding 64m dia., 9mm thick beryllium Mirror shield Bussard field 100,000t of water ice



[1]        R. Heinlein, Universe, Astounding Science Fiction, May 1941.

[2]        G. Bear, Hull Zero Three, Orbit, 2010.

[3]        S. Baxter, Ark, Gollancz, 2009.

[4]        G.L. Matloff, Deep Space Probes, Springer, 2010.

[5]        P. Gilster, Centauri Dreams, Springer, 2004.

[6]        E.E. Smith, Skylark of Space, Amazing Stories, 1928.

[7]        C. Smith, ‘The Lady Who Sailed the Soul’, Galaxy, 1960.

[8]        A.C. Clarke, ‘The Wind from the Sun’, Boy’s Life Magazine, March 1964.

[9]        L. Niven and J. Pournelle, The Mote in God’s Eye, Simon & Schuster, 1974.

[10]      R. Forward, Rocheworld, Baen Books, 1990 (first publication 1982, much expanded edition 1990).

[11]      B. Aldrin, J. Barnes, Encounter with Tiber, Warner, 1996.

[12]      S. Baxter, Space, HarperCollins, 2000.

[13]      G. Bear, Queen of Angels, Warner Books, 1990.

[14]      M. Wilhelm and D. Mathison, James Cameron’s Avatar: An Activist Survival Guide, HarperCollins, 2009.

[15]      L. Niven, Ringworld, Ballantine, 1970.

[16]      I. Shklovskii and C. Sagan, Intelligent Life in the Universe, Holden-Day, Inc, 1966.

[17]      L. Niven and J. Pournelle, Footfall, Del Rey, 1985.

[18]      P. Anderson, Tau Zero, Doubleday, 1970.

[19]      C. Sheffield, ‘All the Colours of the Vacuum’, Analog, 1981.

[20]      A.C. Clarke, The Songs of Distant Earth, Del Rey, 1986.

[21]      A. Bond et al, Project Daedalus Final Report, British Interplanetary Society, 1978.

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive updates on the progress of Project Icarus, and the research field of interstellar flight.

Be Sociable, Share!

16 Responses to Blueprints for a Starship

  1. Adam says:

    Heinlein’s Mass-Conversion drives of his “Future History” seemed a reasonable idea in c.1940-1950, but by “Citizen of the Galaxy” (1956, serialized in “Astounding”) he powered the starships via fusion reactors. I wonder what changed in physics for such a switch at the time?

    Since then sphalerons have been invoked for baryon-burning at high energies in theoretical physics, so maybe one day some one will invent a true mass-conversion drive. Greg Bear’s “Wind from a Burning Woman” short-story, which in an alternate universe version became the “Eon”/”Eternity” duology, is the first SF tale I know to use the new physics in a baryon-burning drive.

    Then there’s the venerable speculation about monopoles catalyzing baryon-decay, which Alastair Reynolds uses to propel near-lightspeed ramjets in his “Revelation Space” universe. AFAIK no one has yet used Hawking decay of minature black-holes to convert mass-to-energy for propulsion in fiction, as recently discussed in cosmology papers by Louis Crane. Arthur Clarke’s Asymptotic Drive (“Imperial Earth”) used a minature black-hole to liberate some mass-energy via accretion in “Imperial Earth”, but unfortunately the Eddington Limit means its power-t0-mass ratio is an abysmal 6.4 W/kg.

    On a final note, Joe Haldeman’s “Forever War” (1974) used ‘tachyon rockets’ for propulsion, pushing the starships to very near-lightspeed and high time-dilation factors. Tachyon propulsion had been speculated on for sub-light propulsion in the early 1970s due to some odd features of tachyon physics. But interstellar propulsion fashions change, so that the sequel, “Forever Free” (1999), had the starships propelled by antimatter, fashionable thanks to Bob Forward’s 1980s/90s studies.

  2. In your own Ark novel, you described mining antimatter from the Jupiter-Io flux tube. That seems like an interesting and perhaps very valuable idea for getting fuel for say, an antimatter-initiated fusion pulse drive. Not to mention raw energy for the Earth (Helium-3 is so last century). How viable is this? Is there a paper on theoretical production and capture rates? The only paper I know of related to this deals with capturing antimatter produced by the solar wind and trapped in planetary magnetic fields (a few nanogrammes at best).

    Thanks for contributing to this blog!

  3. I’m surprised that a physicist would have any time for so-called vacuum energy. So far as I can understand it, that one violates both the law of conservation of energy and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. New physics, indeed!

    As for helium-3 being of the last century, judging by progress so far on first-generation controlled nuclear fusion, helium-3 is looking more like the next century but one!

  4. Richard Obousy says:

    @Troy Campbell

    Great question! Please take a look at:

    @Stephen Ashworth

    Please read up on the Casimir Effect. Also see recent papers on the Casimir effect here:



  5. Sammy says:

    An extremely interesting article which collects together so many of my favorite STL starship designs.

  6. Andrew says:

    Thanks for the summary. I haven’t found all of these sources, so I found this to be an enlightening discussion. I also appreciate the Carl Sagan reference. The time dilation math works, but too few realize the possibilities. Thanks for helping to inspire the dream of interstellar travel.

  7. Martin J Sallberg
    Useful Casimir effect for cheap spacelaunches.
    The Casimir effect is traditionally demonstrated by placing two thin parallel plates mere micrometers apart in a vacuum and letting them slam together. The effect is due to vacuum energy. It can in principle be used to modify the vacuum for cheap spacelaunches and efficient space travel, but that requires preventing the plates from slamming together, so that the Casimir effect remains. That can be done by repulsive magnetic fields or by mechanically holding the plates in the edges (only in the edges, to keep the space between them). Another possibility is to abandon the parallel plates altogether and use microchannels or other microscopic holes instead. Anyone is free to build it, I am not going to claim any patent or money.

  8. I’m gone to say to my little brother, that he should also pay a quick visit this website on regular basis to obtain updated from newest information.

  9. Julissa says:

    I got this website from my friend who told me on the topic of this web site and at the moment this time I am visiting this web site and reading
    very informative articles at this time.

  10. Johan Scholtz says:

    Hi, since Icarus Interstellar’s website is a place where space related ideas are open to be discussed I would like to take this opportunity to open the discussion to an idea that is related to starships. As you know for any starship to be able to function in space it firstly has to leave the atmosphere of the Earth and at the moment only a few elite organizations in the world have the resources to be able to send anything into space. Obviously there a problem here that needs to be solved. The ocean of space needs to be more accessible for people in order for space travel related pioneering and innovation to take place at a faster rate. I think that many people realize that the current rate of space travel related pioneering and innovation is taking place at such a slow rate that most of us will be dead by the time a commercially viable version of warp drive comes into existence or even just a commercially viable personal spaceship that can take a person to the Moon comes into existence. Herewith follows a brief outline of an out of the box idea that addresses this problem with the accessibility of space:

    Can you please provide your thoughts regarding the following concept below? I am having trouble finding an unsolvable problem with this.

    Imagine an array of laser beams pointed into space from the Earth and align the laser beams so close together that particles cannot escape (almost like jail bars tightly packed next to each other) and then aim these lasers at a big dish in orbit (or aim the lasers at the Moon) and the dish will deflect the lasers away and capture the particles (that are being transported/elevated) in the center of the laser beams. This can be used to supply goods into space – to the International Space Station (every time it lines-up) or even to the surface of the Moon. This can also potentially be used to transport people (whom are in protected elevator “cars”) into space – to the International Space Station or also to the surface of the Moon. This would be much cheaper that launching rockets through the Earth’s thick atmosphere. Rather use robots and a few people combined with this laser elevator technology to get supplies and equipment to the surface of the Moon and then build a spaceport there on the Moon for rockets to launch from – the low atmospheric resistance makes the Moon is an ideal proxy launch point for rockets.

    Perhaps finding a material that a high-powered laser cannot burn through is the problem here, however, a few years ago I read about a special material that has been used on a NASA sun probe/satellite that is a highly heat-resistant material, therefore this should probably be able to handle high-powered lasers’ heat. Finding a wind still location is also not an issue, there are a number of optimal unused locations for this. During the night-time there should be more than enough surplus electricity available on the national power grid to power such an array of high-powered lasers.

    I realize this won’t be easy, but the question is, is this impossible? Why can’t this idea work?

    Best regards,

    • Hi Johan,

      Using direct laser propulsion as you propose requires too much power, since light has very little momentum. However, there are variants that could work.If you look in Wikipedia under ‘laser propulsion’ you will find a much better description than what I can give you, as well as the many variants. All these ideas could work, however, at the present world launch rates, the capital investment and development costs are too high for the volume of traffic.

      Michel Lamontagne

    • Tom Russell says:


      You have an interesting concept there; however, if I read it correctly, it appears that you think that the primary difficulty in earth-to-orbit transit is the thickness of the Earth’s atmosphere. This is not the case. In fact the primary difficulty is in overcoming the Earth’s gravitational pull. Your laser elevators do not address this. Likewise, the reason launching rockets off the Moon is easier is not because of the Moon’s lack of atmosphere but rather because of its lower surface gravity.

  11. royce says:

    Take all those lasers and point them at a rocket. Done deal.

  12. Dryson says:

    Abstract – In an article on discussing a Magnetar,

    li_source=LI&li_medium=most-popular, I have a few questions. When atoms get to close to a Magnetar they are stretched into

    pencil-thin rods. How is the gravity of these atoms effected? Does gravity increase or does gravity decrease?

    I was also reading about the huge hole found in the Universe at,

    universe.html, as well.

    Funk and Wagnall’s – H index

    The very first entry is Heat.

    Heat, in physics, transfer of energy from one part of a substance to another, or from one body to another by a virtue in

    temperature. Heat is energy, it always flows down from a substance at a higher temperature to the substance at a lower

    temperature, raising the temperature of the latter and lower the temperature of the former substance, provided the volume

    of the bodies remain constant. Heat does not flow from a lower to a higher temperature unless another form of energy

    transfer, work, is also present.

    Gravitation is something that gives rise to a force. Like most forces, it can be put to work, just like in dams. But

    gravitation is not [COLOR=#6a6a6a]energy[/COLOR]: it’s an interaction between physical bodies with mass.

    What the hole could be is a region in space where the temperature flows from a higher temperature to a lower temperature.

    Seeing as how the area around the hole would actually be warmer because of the heat being generated by numerous solar

    bodies compared to the absence of solar bodies in the region that would have otherwise been detected.

    I would also go to lengths to say that there is not any gravity in this region of space where the hole resides at because

    gravity is a force or an interaction between two physical bodies with mass.

    All bodies with mass generate some degree of heat because of the transfer of energy taking place between the body and

    surrounding bodies.

    Maybe the region is actually time void where everything stops instantly because if there is no gravity then how would time

    flow? Gravity is an indication of forces at work. Heat the is the detectable source of gravity. If there is no heat then

    there is no gravity. If there is no gravity then are not any bodies with mass at work.

    Or possibly bodies with a different type of mass that we are unfamiliar with.

    Although more sci-fi than not probably is the next question. If a Magnetar could be artificially created or at least the

    ability to stretch atoms to almost their breaking point so that gravity is greater reduced would generating a Magnetar

    field around a vessel allow the vessel to in essence reduce the gravity surrounding the vessel allowing the vessel to then

    obtain higher velocity factors? Based on my limited physics background I would have to say that as a ship travels faster

    and faster towards the speed of light that it occupies more space at any moment in time thus actually encountering more

    and more atoms that then generate a stronger gravitational field causing the ship to have to expell more force to overcome

    the gravity that the ship is occupying in space.

    Its like that Blob from the movie the Blob. Someone trapped inside could never generate enough force to break through the

    Blob’s skin, but when ice was applied all chemical reaction in the area where the ice was applied actually killed that

    section of the Blob allowing people to escape. Well they really didn’t escape and were dissolved but basically the same

    process is present with travel to fast as light velocities.

    Without gravity or atoms being present that create gravity that effect the forward velocity of the ship the ship could

    accelerate through space at faster velocities. Basically weakening the “Blob Skin” or the interaction between two bodies

    with mass by stretching the atoms could reduce their gravitational interaction with the mass of the ship just enough to

    allow the ship to accelerate to faster than usual velocities.

    The one seemingly and interesting question in the hole in the Universe is whether or not a ship could pass through it

    seeing as how gravity is not present. If gravity helps hold things together by pushing back from a central source where

    atoms create pressure is not present does the ship exist or would it simple dissolve? I don’t see why it would dissolve

    because if gravity is not present then only the gravity of the ship would be present allowing the ship to travel in it’s

    owb gravity sphere where nothing is pushing back thus allowing the ship to travel fast as light or even faster.

  13. JH Byrne says:

    Alternative Concept for a Deep Space Colony Ship(s):

    In another post, I outlined some of the problems I had with mulit-gen ships, ie, contemporary civilization and all its basic assumptions is simply not cut out for a (tightly) closed cycle environment. We all inherently understand this, which is likely why, 50+ years ago, the fashion in Science Fiction began to pine for FTL ships: we know we can’t wait, so we’ll just pull a rabbit out of a hat (deus ex machina) wave our magic wand of ‘tomorrow’s technology’ and get there. It’s a cheap exit.
    If Einstein is correct, we will never achieve FTL — even 10% light speed would be hazardous — how do you navigate? How do you avoid a catastrophic collision with a speck of dust, when you are traveling at 10% of light speed?
    But: this website is all about ‘what-ifs’. So, let’s shoot for that 10%, and see where it takes us. How can we achieve anything approximating that? How can we survive as a society during a trip?
    It seems to me that we need redundancy, and a (continous) source of ‘energy’.
    I am not talking about resource redundancy, but civilizational redundancy. In other words, if your prospective crew forget or lose their way as a society, how do you ‘remind’ them? On Earth, that is one of the (unspoken) functions of war — inefficient or forgetful societies lose… so there is an inherent incentive to keep one’s edge.
    For the purposes of sending a survivable community of humans to another star, we can’t send one ship: we have to send SEVERAL, who by constant interaction, would remind one another of their underlying purpose.

    So: we have several ships. For purposes of THIS model, let us keep it simple — TWO ‘ships’. Presumeably, these are massive ships (let us say 3 kilometer asteroids that can be utilized enroute).
    Send both asteroids in the direction of your target star. We’re all familiar with gravity assist orbits — by diving into a large gravity well, a smaller craft can swerve away and utilize some of the massive body’s gravity to assist its further acceleration.

    But: what if our TWO massive colony asteroids use EACH OTHER for gravity assist? What if they are targeted at each other, swerve around each other, and then leap-frog across the solar system? Obviously, the consequences of navigational error are.. fatal. But, in deep space, there are less unforeseeable variables (ie, no atmospheric fluctuations, obstacles, etc). Deep space is near laboratory condition, perfect vaccuum. Onboard navigational computers can make predictable course changes, resulting in predictable (and therefore controllable) gravity assists, again and again and again.
    Swing in, get the swing boost from your traveling partner, shoot out into space with a slight increase in velocity, course correct for a gradual curve heading BACK to your partner, and repeat, infinitely.
    The flight path of a colony-tandem would likely resemble a helix through space.
    The questions remain: would a colony-tandem helix WORK as a means of ‘stealing’ a little extra velocity, without too much cost in energy?
    Remember, that even if the net gain is fairly small, it could in theory be repeated indefinitely, resulting in a net improvement in velocity, WITHOUT an increase in acceleration…

    The physics of tandem gravity helix boosts as a means of increasing speed over time is not my specialty. Are there any rocket scientists out there, who can tell us how this might be a workable proposal?

    • The tandem idea will not work, since no energy is added to the system. It is a kind of perpetual motion machine. Sorry. However, the civilisation questions are interesting and worthwile. I agree several ships is a good idea, both for survival and diversity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *