<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Antimatter Propulsion &#8211; the beginnings of true interstellar flight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/antimatter-propulsion-beginnings-true-interstellar-flight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/antimatter-propulsion-beginnings-true-interstellar-flight/</link>
	<description>A Fusion Starship Study</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:45:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Targets for interstellar missions, icarus target, project icarus, icarus planet target &#8212; Project Icarus</title>
		<link>http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/antimatter-propulsion-beginnings-true-interstellar-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>Targets for interstellar missions, icarus target, project icarus, icarus planet target &#8212; Project Icarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 02:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/?p=68#comment-642</guid>
		<description>[...] these imply a maximum realistic range of 15 light-years from the Solar System. This would imply an interstellar cruise velocity of 15% of the speed of light (i.e. 0.15c) to reach within 100 years, which is probably close to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] these imply a maximum realistic range of 15 light-years from the Solar System. This would imply an interstellar cruise velocity of 15% of the speed of light (i.e. 0.15c) to reach within 100 years, which is probably close to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious</title>
		<link>http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/antimatter-propulsion-beginnings-true-interstellar-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 20:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/?p=68#comment-587</guid>
		<description>Richard,

As noted in a couple of earlier comments, one of the biggest hurdles for any kind of propulsion system that directly uses antimatter will be dealing with the gamma ray emissions generated by the annihilation. Setting aside the complexity of using the gamma rays for propulsion (which may not be practically possible), I&#039;m curious if anyone has computed the amount of shielding that would be required to protect the rest of the spacecraft from the gamma rays. Presumably any scientific payload would be completely fried by direct exposure. Do you have any preliminary calculations on the amount of shielding that would be required to protect the payload, and how much mass that might add to the spacecraft? Also of concern is the effect of high levels of gamma ray emissions on the propulsion system itself, but I assume that will be addressed in one of the future articles you mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>As noted in a couple of earlier comments, one of the biggest hurdles for any kind of propulsion system that directly uses antimatter will be dealing with the gamma ray emissions generated by the annihilation. Setting aside the complexity of using the gamma rays for propulsion (which may not be practically possible), I&#8217;m curious if anyone has computed the amount of shielding that would be required to protect the rest of the spacecraft from the gamma rays. Presumably any scientific payload would be completely fried by direct exposure. Do you have any preliminary calculations on the amount of shielding that would be required to protect the payload, and how much mass that might add to the spacecraft? Also of concern is the effect of high levels of gamma ray emissions on the propulsion system itself, but I assume that will be addressed in one of the future articles you mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Ashworth</title>
		<link>http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/antimatter-propulsion-beginnings-true-interstellar-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Ashworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/?p=68#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Richard, I am interested in antimatter propulsion, and would appreciate seeing your next article on it!

Stephen
23 April</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, I am interested in antimatter propulsion, and would appreciate seeing your next article on it!</p>
<p>Stephen<br />
23 April</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Obousy</title>
		<link>http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/antimatter-propulsion-beginnings-true-interstellar-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Obousy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/?p=68#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Tim, 

It&#039;s an interesting point, but don&#039;t forget that we opened the Pandora&#039;s box in the 1940s with nuclear weapons and since then have lived with the possibility of destruction on a global scale. I don&#039;t see there being any difference with antimatter.

Also, as a matter of fact Kim Jong Il already has nuclear capabilities.

With any new technology comes responsibility and I don&#039;t believe it&#039;s productive to approach these with the mindset of &quot;Catastrophe A,B or C could happen, therefore we should not pursue the technology&quot;, but more with the mindset of &quot;Because A,B or C is a possibility we should take precautions D,E and F to do our best that they do not.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, </p>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting point, but don&#8217;t forget that we opened the Pandora&#8217;s box in the 1940s with nuclear weapons and since then have lived with the possibility of destruction on a global scale. I don&#8217;t see there being any difference with antimatter.</p>
<p>Also, as a matter of fact Kim Jong Il already has nuclear capabilities.</p>
<p>With any new technology comes responsibility and I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s productive to approach these with the mindset of &#8220;Catastrophe A,B or C could happen, therefore we should not pursue the technology&#8221;, but more with the mindset of &#8220;Because A,B or C is a possibility we should take precautions D,E and F to do our best that they do not.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/antimatter-propulsion-beginnings-true-interstellar-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/?p=68#comment-134</guid>
		<description>And most imortant, what if, when there is mass amounts of antimatter, a spill happened, like the frequent oil-rig spills, wouldn&#039;t that create annihilation to the nth extent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And most imortant, what if, when there is mass amounts of antimatter, a spill happened, like the frequent oil-rig spills, wouldn&#8217;t that create annihilation to the nth extent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/antimatter-propulsion-beginnings-true-interstellar-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/?p=68#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Antimatter would be splendid for space travel, but don&#039;t you think that with all these idiots around that if antimatter was mass-produced and one of these idiots I speak of got a hold of it; like Kim Jong Il for example, what do you think would come of this planet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antimatter would be splendid for space travel, but don&#8217;t you think that with all these idiots around that if antimatter was mass-produced and one of these idiots I speak of got a hold of it; like Kim Jong Il for example, what do you think would come of this planet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/antimatter-propulsion-beginnings-true-interstellar-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/?p=68#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard
Pions are not an end point of annihilation, but intermediate steps - eventually it&#039;s all gamma-rays and neutrinos. Neutral pions ignore any magnetic fields - and a significant fraction of the annihilation energy is carried away by neutral pions. A perfect antimatter rocket needs a gamma-ray reflector... not an easy thing to create.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard<br />
Pions are not an end point of annihilation, but intermediate steps &#8211; eventually it&#8217;s all gamma-rays and neutrinos. Neutral pions ignore any magnetic fields &#8211; and a significant fraction of the annihilation energy is carried away by neutral pions. A perfect antimatter rocket needs a gamma-ray reflector&#8230; not an easy thing to create.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Obousy</title>
		<link>http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/antimatter-propulsion-beginnings-true-interstellar-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Obousy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/?p=68#comment-81</guid>
		<description>With regards to the Larmor frequency question, the frequency is a function of the charge to mass ratio which will be the same for both matter and antimatter.

Also, EM radiation (gamma rays) won&#039;t be effected by any particular magnetic moment so unfortunately I don&#039;t think that would work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regards to the Larmor frequency question, the frequency is a function of the charge to mass ratio which will be the same for both matter and antimatter.</p>
<p>Also, EM radiation (gamma rays) won&#8217;t be effected by any particular magnetic moment so unfortunately I don&#8217;t think that would work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Obousy</title>
		<link>http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/antimatter-propulsion-beginnings-true-interstellar-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Obousy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/?p=68#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Hey Adam,

That would be for the case of positron-electron annihiliation. The by-products of proton-antiproton are neutral and charged pions which could be directed for thrust. The process won&#039;t be anywhere near 100% efficient, but it will be a lot better than fusion in terms of total energy liberated per unit mass of propellant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Adam,</p>
<p>That would be for the case of positron-electron annihiliation. The by-products of proton-antiproton are neutral and charged pions which could be directed for thrust. The process won&#8217;t be anywhere near 100% efficient, but it will be a lot better than fusion in terms of total energy liberated per unit mass of propellant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConcreteDragon</title>
		<link>http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/antimatter-propulsion-beginnings-true-interstellar-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>ConcreteDragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/?p=68#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Hola!

Could you use the Larmor precession (like is used in MRI&#039;s) to align the spin so you could focus the Gamma Radiation?  BTW, is the Larmor frequency  the same for Antimatter as it is for Matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hola!</p>
<p>Could you use the Larmor precession (like is used in MRI&#8217;s) to align the spin so you could focus the Gamma Radiation?  BTW, is the Larmor frequency  the same for Antimatter as it is for Matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/antimatter-propulsion-beginnings-true-interstellar-flight/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.icarusinterstellar.org/blog/?p=68#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard

One problem antimatter has is the energy &amp; intensity of the gamma-rays produced and then getting them going in the right direction to provide net thrust. Inefficient use of the gamma-rays means a much lower fraction of the energy liberated can be used for a rocket. Any thoughts on getting it going the right way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard</p>
<p>One problem antimatter has is the energy &amp; intensity of the gamma-rays produced and then getting them going in the right direction to provide net thrust. Inefficient use of the gamma-rays means a much lower fraction of the energy liberated can be used for a rocket. Any thoughts on getting it going the right way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

